what happens when you file a grievance against an attorney

What Happens When You File a Grievance Against an Attorney?

As legal professionals, attorneys have a duty to provide competent and ethical representation to their clients. However, if you believe that your attorney has acted unprofessionally, violated ethical rules, or engaged in misconduct, you have the right to file a grievance against them. This blog post will guide you through the general process of filing a grievance against an attorney, including the steps involved, the investigation stage, the lawyer’s response, and the possible outcomes in such cases.

Filing the Complaint

The first step in filing a grievance against an attorney is to submit a formal complaint to the appropriate authority or disciplinary board. Typically, this authority is the state bar association or a similar regulatory body that oversees the conduct of attorneys. It is essential to carefully review the rules and procedures set forth by the jurisdiction where the attorney practices to ensure compliance with the requirements for filing a complaint.

When preparing your complaint, it is crucial to provide specific details about the attorney’s alleged misconduct. This includes dates, times, locations, and any supporting evidence such as documents, emails, or other relevant materials. Clearly articulate the ethical rules or professional standards you believe the attorney has violated. Keep in mind that the more detailed and well-documented your complaint, the better chances it has of being taken seriously and investigated thoroughly.

The Investigation Stage

Once the complaint is filed, the disciplinary authority will review it and initiate an investigation. This stage aims to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support the allegations made against the attorney. The investigation process can vary in duration, depending on the complexity of the case, the availability of witnesses or evidence, and the workload of the disciplinary authority.

During the investigation, the disciplinary authority may request additional information from you, the complainant, as well as from the attorney being accused. They may also interview witnesses or obtain relevant documents to gather as much evidence as possible. It is important to cooperate fully with the investigation, providing any requested information or assistance to help the disciplinary authority evaluate your complaint thoroughly.

See Also: Can I Have Two Attorneys On My Case?

The Opportunity to Respond

Once the attorney being accused is notified of the grievance, they have the opportunity to respond to the allegations. The lawyer’s response is a critical aspect of the process, as it allows them to present their side of the story and provide any evidence or explanation to refute the allegations. The attorney may choose to hire legal representation to guide them through this stage and protect their rights.

In their response, the attorney may address each allegation individually, providing their version of events, or they may present a comprehensive defense to challenge the validity of the complaint as a whole. The disciplinary authority will consider the attorney’s response alongside the evidence gathered during the investigation to make an informed decision.

Possible Outcomes

Upon completion of the investigation and review of the lawyer’s response, the disciplinary authority will reach a decision. The possible outcomes of a grievance against an attorney can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the severity of the misconduct alleged. Here are some possible scenarios:


If the disciplinary authority finds insufficient evidence or determines that the attorney’s conduct does not warrant disciplinary action, they may dismiss the complaint. Dismissal can occur if there is a lack of corroborating evidence, inconsistencies in the complainant’s account, or if the alleged misconduct does not violate ethical rules or professional standards. It is important to note that a dismissal does not necessarily mean the attorney’s behavior was ethical or appropriate; it simply indicates a lack of evidence to support disciplinary action.

Informal Resolution

In some cases, the disciplinary authority may facilitate an informal resolution between the parties involved. This approach aims to address the concerns raised in the complaint without resorting to formal disciplinary measures. Informal resolution methods may include mediation or other alternative dispute resolution techniques. The goal is to encourage dialogue, understanding, and potential remedies to the issues at hand. If an agreement is reached, it is typically documented in writing, and both parties may be required to fulfill certain obligations or commitments.

Reprimand or Censure

If the attorney’s conduct is found to be in violation of ethical rules or professional standards but does not warrant severe disciplinary measures, they may receive a reprimand or censure. A reprimand is a formal warning from the disciplinary authority that acknowledges the attorney’s misconduct and reminds them of their ethical obligations. It is a disciplinary measure that stays on the attorney’s record, serving as a mark against their professional reputation. A censure is similar to a reprimand but is usually considered a more serious form of discipline.


In more serious cases, the disciplinary authority may suspend the attorney’s license to practice law for a specified period. Suspension involves the temporary revocation of the attorney’s right to represent clients and engage in legal practice. The duration of the suspension can vary depending on the severity of the misconduct and the jurisdiction’s guidelines. During the suspension, the attorney may be required to complete certain educational courses, demonstrate rehabilitation, or meet other conditions before reinstatement. It is important to note that a suspended attorney may face limitations and restrictions even after the period of suspension is over.


The most severe consequence of attorney misconduct is disbarment, which permanently revokes the attorney’s license to practice law. Disbarment is typically reserved for cases involving serious ethical violations, repeated misconduct, or criminal behavior. This outcome is a definitive and permanent removal of the attorney’s ability to practice law. Disbarred attorneys may be prohibited from seeking reinstatement in the future and are often required to meet stringent criteria if they attempt to regain their license.


Filing a grievance against an attorney is a serious matter that requires careful consideration and adherence to the established procedures. The process involves filing a complaint, a thorough investigation, the attorney’s response, and potential outcomes ranging from dismissal to disciplinary measures such as reprimand, suspension, or disbarment. It is important to consult the rules and regulations of the relevant jurisdiction and cooperate fully with the disciplinary authority to ensure a fair evaluation of your complaint.

It is essential to understand that the disciplinary process and potential outcomes can vary significantly depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the case. Different jurisdictions may have distinct rules and guidelines for attorney discipline, and the severity of the punishment can vary accordingly. Therefore, it is crucial to consult the rules and regulations of the relevant jurisdiction to gain a more accurate understanding of the potential outcomes and their implications.

Image Credit: Scop.io